RSM logo
Journal of Medical Screening

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Med Screen 2009;16:1-6
doi:10.1258/jms.2009.008080
© 2009 Medical Screening Society

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardelid, P
Right arrow Articles by Dezateux, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Articles

Rubella seroprevalence in pregnant women in North Thames: estimates based on newborn screening samples

P Hardelid  , MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

M Cortina-Borja , MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

D Williams , MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

P A Tookey , MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

C S Peckham , MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

W D Cubitt , Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust London WC1N 3JH, UK

C Dezateux , MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK; Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust London WC1 N 3JH, UK

Correspondence to: P Hardelid, Statistics Unit, Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK; pia.hardelid{at}hpa.org.uk


Objectives Routine screening for rubella susceptibility is recommended in the UK so that women found to be susceptible can be offered immunization in the post partum period. We demonstrate the use of newborn dried blood spot samples linked to routine vital statistics datasets to monitor rubella susceptibility in pregnant women and to investigate maternal characteristics as determinants of rubella seronegativity.

Setting North Thames region of England (including large parts of inner London).

Methods Maternally acquired rubella IgG antibody levels were measured in 18882 newborn screening blood spot samples. Latent class regression finite mixture models were used to classify samples as seronegative to rubella. Data on maternal country of birth were available through linkage to birth registration data.

Results An estimated 2.7% (95% CI 2.4%–3.0%) of newly delivered women in North Thames were found to be seronegative. Mothers born abroad, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, were more likely to be seronegative than UK-born mothers, with adjusted odds ratios of 4.2 (95% CI 3.1–5.6) and 5.0 (3.8–6.5), respectively. Mothers under 20 years were more likely to be seronegative than those aged 30 to 34.

Conclusion Our findings highlight the need for vaccination to be targeted specifically at migrant women and their families to ensure that they are protected from rubella in pregnancy and its serious consequences.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




How Not to be a Doctor