Journal of Medical Screening > Volume 16, Number 2 > Pp. 91-97

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Klungsøyr, O. Articles by Nygård, J. F PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original Articles

Validity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian women

Ole Klungsøyr, Statistician Researcher  , Department of Screening-based Research, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo

Mari Nygård, Epidemiologist, Senior Researcher , Department of Screening-based Research, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo

Gry Skare, Advisor , Department of Screening-based Research, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo

Tormod Eriksen, IT Advisor , IT Department, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo

Jan F Nygård, Head of IT and Registration Section , The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo

Correspondence to: Ole Klungsøyr, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway; Ole.Klungsoyr{at}kreftregisteret.no

---

Objectives To assess the validity of self-reported Papanicolau (Pap) smear history in Norwegian women and to identify characteristics that influence the validity.

Methods Interview data from a sample of 16,574 Norwegian women, aged 18–45, in 2004–2005, was compared with information from the population-based cytology register. Crude validity in the self-reports with respect to ever/never having taken a Pap smear was summarized. The validity of the reported interval since last Pap smear was assessed by a smoothed distribution of the reported interval, stratified by the registered interval. Characteristics of influence on validity were identified by logistic regression for true positives (sensitivity and positive predictive value), true negatives (specificity and negative predictive value) and for more than one year discrepancy in time since last Pap smear, between reported and registered interval.

Results Overall validity was summarized by: concordance = 0.9, sensitivity = 0.97, positive predictive value = 0.92, specificity = 0.55, negative predictive value = 0.78 and report-to-records ratio = 1.51. The variance in the reported interval increased proportionally with the registered interval, and women tended to underestimate the interval (telescoping). Age and registered number of years since last Pap smear had the strongest influence on ever/never and time interval validity, respectively.

Conclusions Estimated screening rates, based on self-reporting without organized screening, are biased. Telescoping leads to increased risk for developing invasive disease, because women will postpone their next Pap smear.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?