Journal of Medical Screening > Volume 16, Number 3 > Pp. 140-146

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Nickson, C. Articles by Kavanagh, A. M PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original Articles

Tumour size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density

Carolyn Nickson, Research Fellow  , Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, 2/723 Swanston St. Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia

Anne M Kavanagh, Director , Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, 2/723 Swanston St. Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia

Correspondence to: Dr Carolyn Nickson, Research Fellow, Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, 2/723 Swanston St. Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia; cnickson{at}unimelb.edu.au

---

Objectives Breast cancer prognosis is better for smaller tumours. Women with high breast density are at higher risk of breast cancer and have larger screen-detected and interval cancers in mammographic screening programmes. We assess which continuous measures of breast density are the strongest predictors of breast tumour size at detection and therefore the best measures to identify women who might benefit from more intensive mammographic screening or alternative screening strategies.

Setting and methods We compared the association between breast density and tumour size for 1007 screen-detected and 341 interval cancers diagnosed in an Australian mammographic screening programme between 1994 and 1996, for three semi-automated continuous measures of breast density: per cent density, dense area and dense area adjusted for non-dense area.

Results After adjustment for age, hormone therapy use, family history of breast cancer and mode of detection (screen-detected or interval cancers), all measures of breast density shared a similar positive and significant association with tumour size. For example, tumours increased in size with dense area from an estimated mean 2.2 mm larger in the second quintile (β = 2.2; 95% CI 0.4–3.9, P < 0.001) to mean 6.6 mm larger in the highest decile of dense area (β = 6.6; 95% CI 4.4–8.9, P < 0.001), when compared with first quintile of breast density.

Conclusions Of the breast density measures assessed, either dense area or per cent density are suitable measures for identifying women who might benefit from more intensive mammographic screening or alternative screening strategies.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?