RSM logo
Journal of Medical Screening

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Med Screen 2008;15:188-198
doi:10.1258/jms.2008.008069
© 2008 Medical Screening Society

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canfell, K.
Right arrow Articles by Beral, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Normal endometrial cells in cervical cytology: systematic review of prevalence and relation to significant endometrial pathology

Karen CanfellDPhil, Sydney Rotary Research Fellow  , Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, Cancer Council New South Wales, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia and School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia

Yoon Jung KangMPH (Hons), PhD Student , Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, New South Wales, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia and School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia

Mark ClementsPhD, Research Fellow , The National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Aye Myat MoaMPH, Research Assistant , Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, New South Wales, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Valerie BeralFRS, Director , Cancer Epidemiology Unit, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 (A) Summary estimate for prevalence of normal endometrial cells (NECs) in older women as a percentage of all smears (from women of all ages). (B) Summary estimate for prevalence of NECs in older women in the postmenopausal period or women aged 40+ years

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 (A) Summary estimate for overall proportion of followed-up women with normal endometrial cells (NECs) found to have significant endometrial pathology. (B) Summary estimate for overall proportion of followed-up women with NECs found to have endometrial carcinoma

 

Figure 3
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3 (A) Summary estimate for proportion of followed-up women with normal endometrial cells (NECs) found to have significant endometrial pathology who also present with symptoms. (B) Summary estimate for proportion of followed-up women with NECs found to have endometrial carcinoma who also present with symptoms

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



History of the London Clinic